During a year of some of the worst flooding the United States has ever seen, spanning just about every state except those in severe drought (such as Texas), the US federal government is planning to shut down 376 stream gages due to 'lack of funding' (Thanks to @wunderground on Twitter for this link). Apparently, a USGS stream gage costs around $15,700 a year to maintain, a minimal sum when compared to its benefits. Stream gages allow for accurate flood warnings, that save lives, livestock and property... allow for flood plans to be estimated more accurately... and provide information on water supply during times of drought.
I'm trying not to get into politics too deeply here, since it is a contentious issue and I feel that this is a non-partisan issue and need. But, when I think about other things our government and economy expend money and resources on, and how tiny a speck the cost of a stream gage is in the grand picture, I am disgusted. Are human lives, or our homes and everything in them, or our, businesses, crops, and livestock that are our livelihood... not worth $15,700 a year in each of these watersheds? Are we, the people of the United States, unable or unwilling to demand that our representative government provide cheap and effective services that protect us from loss of life, or is the system so broken that the government is not at all representative of us any more?
There should be many more stream gages being installed, none being removed, and many more rain gages also being added in upper watershed areas.
If our government is unwilling or unable to provide stream and rain gages, I think we need to look into alternatives. Perhaps a citizen-science type network of people could be assembled who are willing to invest a lesser sum in an automated weather station (probably under $500.00 - perhaps with a tax rebate or grant?) or some form of 'cheap and dirty' stream gage. Perhaps state governments or private industry could step in (I know I keep mentioning Google, but I know they could be a part of this). If all else fails, we need a watershed/flood smartphone/computer reporting network (as mentioned before in this blog I am partial to the iNaturalist / whatsinvasive format). Even a normal webcam aimed at a $3 yardstick in the creek would be better than nothing (though it was just pointed out to me that it would be impossible to see at night, when floods are most dangerous!)
The VTResponse people are doing an amazing job and helping organize flood recovery in Vermont. Who is going to step forward to protect us from the next flood? We have great people at the USGS already willing to process the data and inform the authorities of imminent flooding... but they can't do that without having the data in the first place.
Stories about the ways water moves through natural and human-constructed landscapes... what we can learn from it and how we can use old and new ideas to understand, appreciate, and sustainably use this resource.
Showing posts with label watershed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label watershed. Show all posts
Friday, September 9, 2011
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Preparing for or Preventing the Next Vermont Flood
Irene has come and gone from Vermont, but we are going to be dealing with her effects for a long time. Homes and businesses are destroyed, roads and bridges washed out, and people displaced and understandably concerned.
Irene was an 'almost-worst-case-scenario' for Vermont, and hopefully we won't see anything like it again in our lifetimes. However, floods are a part of Vermont life and we will certainly face other damaging floods in the years to come. While we can't completely stop them, there are things we can do to decrease their intensity and increase our preparedness when they do occur.
In some ways, reducing flooding in Vermont is harder than in many areas. Unlike Pittsburgh, with highly urbanized, modified watersheds, or California, with its channelized streams and massive habitat loss, Vermont is a mainly rural state with vast, healthy forests and small towns. Still, there is much we can do to reduce risk and impact of floods.
This post includes some ideas I have about how to reduce flooding risk, prepare for floods, and better cope when they do occur. If you think these ideas make sense, please share this with others. If you think they don't make sense, leave a comment and tell me why. The most important thing right now, aside from cleanup and repairs, is looking ahead together as a state to make sure nothing like this happens again.
Below are my ideas, in somewhat random order:
Irene was an 'almost-worst-case-scenario' for Vermont, and hopefully we won't see anything like it again in our lifetimes. However, floods are a part of Vermont life and we will certainly face other damaging floods in the years to come. While we can't completely stop them, there are things we can do to decrease their intensity and increase our preparedness when they do occur.
In some ways, reducing flooding in Vermont is harder than in many areas. Unlike Pittsburgh, with highly urbanized, modified watersheds, or California, with its channelized streams and massive habitat loss, Vermont is a mainly rural state with vast, healthy forests and small towns. Still, there is much we can do to reduce risk and impact of floods.
This post includes some ideas I have about how to reduce flooding risk, prepare for floods, and better cope when they do occur. If you think these ideas make sense, please share this with others. If you think they don't make sense, leave a comment and tell me why. The most important thing right now, aside from cleanup and repairs, is looking ahead together as a state to make sure nothing like this happens again.
Below are my ideas, in somewhat random order:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)